Showing posts with label Sony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sony. Show all posts

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Awesome bass fun time!

Q: What are the holy grail bass headsets? I want to buy a pair of headphones that have awesome bass and make listening to music enjoyable.

A: Holy grail bass (because the first thing you say when you listen to them is "Jesus!") = Sony XB500/700/1000

Ark of the covenant bass (because I'll probably find the freaking ark of the covenant more easily than I find a D7k) = Denon D5000/7000

Antichrist bass (preceded of course by the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse bass, which are obviously Bose, Skullcandy, Monster and the Audio Technica AD900X) = Beats. Any Beats, because that's the brand audiophiles most love to beats up on.

The great pretender bass (it thinks it's a king, but it ain't) = the Audio technica ATHM50X. It has bassm, more bass, and pretgty much nothing but the bass.

The Shadow (because it actually has awesome bass, but no-one knows it exists) = JVC HA-SZ2000 - come on, admit it, how many of you know it's out there as an option: ready, waiting, even yearning for bassheads to pick it up and try it out?

Twins with an attitude (like the girls who picked you up at a bar and showed you what a "fun" time means until you collapsed in exhaustion at 5 am the next morning) = the Philips Fidelio X1/X2

Friday, July 31, 2015

Comparing two Sony bass monsters

Q: What's the difference between the Sony XB500 and the XB700? Why are they so sought after?

A: Sony discontinued the awesome XB500/700/1000 and replaced them with abominations, for reasons that no human, except maybe a couple of folks in a building at 171 Konan Minato-ku, can possibly comprehend.

Since then, obviously due to the fact that [1] they were awesome bass monsters, [2] they were discontinued, and [3] supplies dwindled over time, they have become sought-after collectors items, and have naturally increased in value.

The XB700 has bigger drivers. The memory foam pads are about the size of a CD for comparison, so they are bigger around the ears than the XB500. As a consequence the volume of air that resonates is also greater.

The XB500 has more raw bass. XB700 bass is a little more subtle, and a little tighter. Subbass extension is also better than the 500. Kick drums sound a little crisper, and low end basslines are a little more defined than the 500. 500 bass is more in-your-face, and upper bass rolloff bleeds into the mids audibly, as a consequence of which the mids appear to be a little more recessed than those of the 700.

Soundstage is about the same for both, i.e. not very spectacular. I have convinced myself that 700 soundstage is a little wider than the 500, but IMO that is probably a figment of my imagination than real.

Purely as a bass monster, I would rank the 500 higher, but between the two I end up reaching for the 700 more for EDM. The way I think of the 700 is that it is a more refined version of the 500, i.e. the 500 in a tuxedo.

Sunday, July 26, 2015

The Sony NWZ-A17SLV: The new face of the Walkman

The A17 is an interesting offering from Sony, obviously throwing down a challenge to the Fiios and the iBassos, and shall I say it...the Ponos of the world?

On the surface this is a great looking DAP. What you are really paying for here is Sony's expertise in the audio industry, with their proprietary hardware and firmware tweaks.

Sony has a great track record, from the original Walkman on. Some super hits (the NWZ series of DAPs), some gear that is absolutely stratospherically good (the PHA2, XB500/700/1000) and even some iconic cult classics (the MDRR10, even the TPS-L2).

But more than any other audio manufacturer (yes, including HiFiman!), Sony has broken my heart. I can forgive them the tizzy MDRZ7 and the surprisingly clunky and redundant UDA1/S, but the internet-connected NW ZX1 really took the cake. I lusted after it for months, couldn't wait to get my hands on it, had dreams about it, and then when I finally nabbed one, it was a huge disappointment, mainly because it had an excessively high noise floor. For the price, it wasn't just a trivial nagging background hiss, it made music literally hard to listen to on some of my more finicky IEMs.

But I didn't learn my lesson (and a very expensive lesson it was too) with the ZX1, I went and checked out the A15. Another gorgeously built device from Sony with all the usual Sony bells and whistles, but no internet connectivity, an interface that made even the crappy Fiio X3 interface bearable, and, wait for it, the dreaded hiss.

You would think I had learned my lesson, but then alas I started lusting after the A17. Third time is a charm, I said to myself, they would surely get it right this time, right?

So what is the A17 all about?

It's not internet enabled, though, like the ZX1 or ZX2 are. And it doesn't run Android but a version of the old Sony firmware that I have become familiar with since my NWZ-S616 days.

It does allow you to play almost every audiophile format you can throw at it, including flac and alac and aac (thankfully no ATRAC!), although it doesn't support DSD. Which is not surprising, because how many DSD songs can you get into that 64GB memory? Four? Five?

You can extend memory with a 128GB SDXC card though, although that adds to the cost. But you have to admit that 192GB is plenty of shelf space even for the most die hard audiophiles (you know the ones that are cybernetically connected to their 1st gen iPod classics).

Battery life is the bane of these devices (except my trusty old Cowon D2, which has the kind of battery life you would expect a nuclear powered aircraft carrier to have) but the A17 manages a healthy theoretical 50 hours. I say theoretical because when I was trying it out, it lasted only about 20 hours or thereabouts. I have no idea if that is par for the course or not.

I'm typically not a fan of the gimmicky digital processing that Sony does, for example DSEE, but its amplification design for the A17, including the so-called HMaster HX digital amplification, is on the money. Check out how Sony implemented the amp topology, its pretty cool, for example they used a POSCAP capacitor as the charge pump.

The interface is more intuitive than the crap on my Fiio X3 (Sorry X3 fanboys, but you know that even with the firmware update, the X3 interface is, well, crap) but it is still somewhat clunky. The screen is tiny but well illuminated (OLED?) but even though you can view video, i wouldn't use the A17 as a video player any more than I would use it as a smartphone.

Overall the sound is remarkably neutral. Highs are crisp (something I found lacking with the ZX1) and detail is superb. The only minuses are that it struggles to power even moderate impedance headphones, and there is an irritating hint of a hiss with exacting IEMs (floor noise is what killed the ZX1 for me as well). Which is frustrating, because if you can't pair audiophile DAPs with something like the Shure SE535 (which is great but nitpicks when it comes to floor noise) then what would you pair it with?

And the A17 struggles even with moderate impedance headphones with its 10mW per channel output, so it's really not an option except for portable use.

I suppose the A17 should be on the shortlist for folks looking at a standalone DAP, and I do prefer it to my Fiio X3 (which is languishing in a drawer somewhere because every time I use it I end up more irritated than happy). And
if you don't have prima donna IEMs that act like divas when it comes to amps, then the A17 may be a great choice. The S-Master HX topology is actually very cool and innovative, Sony DSEE is one of the fre implementations of digital sound enhancement that does not strip the music of its soul, the battery runs for longer than you would expect (around 30 hours by my reckoning), plus it charges quick too, the max of 192 GB storage (64 internal + 128 addon) is enough for any audiophile (at least for now), and the build quality is excellent - it just feels solid and right in your hand.

But the damn hiss makes your mambo sound more like a mamba. It makes me wish that Sony included Riki Tikki Tavi in the box with every DAP they sold to me.

And there are three more compelling reasons to pass on the A17.

First, from a price performance perspective its hard to look beyond the Fiio X1, or even the Sony NWZ-E385, which doesn't allow lossless files but then how many people critically listen to flac files when they are on the go anyway?

Second, the lack of internet access is irritating, because most of my on-the-go music now comes from streaming services. The A17 does have Bluetooth streaming though, but I did not test it.

But third (and probably most tellingly), it still doesn't demonstrate a compelling advantage over my Cowon D2, which has been my DAP workhorse for a long time now, mainly because I can't find anything better
But oh yes, one thing I learned during my time with the A17 is that it has an FM tuner.

Who knew FM radio still existed?

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Are certain headphones better for different genres of music?

Q: Are certain headphones better for different genres of music?

A: In general, yes, absolutely. Some headphone sound profiles particularly complement specific genres (for example the Sony XB700 and DnB, or Grados and rock). The general nature of the sound can affect music substantially, for example "fun" headphones color the sound in a way that is very different than "balanced" headphones.

Neutral or analytical headphones like the Sennheiser HD600 or HD800 may be useful for critical listening.

And finally, some headphones just bring out the natural splendor of specific instruments, for example the Sennheiser HD650 really makes stringed instruments shine.